Fortune-telling – GMAT Question of the Day

QOD2015_0731
GMAT Recruiting – Question of the Day
July 31, 2015
GMAT question of the Day -- Data Sufficiency
Data Sufficiency – Question of the Day
August 5, 2015
Show all

Fortune-telling – GMAT Question of the Day

QOD2015_0803
Explanation
When we read the question, this is a brief, pseudo-syllogistic argument, so we will use term matching.
Evidence Term Matches? Conclusion Term
Astrology uses scientific methods \neq Astrology is a true field of science
  The conclusion comes at the beginning of this argument; "Astrology is a true field of science" is the opinion that draws on the other facts for support. The improperly matched term is "true field of science." The most critical assumption is roughly, "A field that uses scientific methods is a true field of science." That statement or a variant of it, such as its contrapositive, is what we're expecting as the answer. Testing this prediction, (C) and (D) both have the right terms involved. Choice (D) matches our prediction. Choice (C) is the logical inversion of what we're looking for, so it is not correct. We can look for logical confirmation of the correct answer: We can prove choice (D) with the negation test. Say that employing scientific methods did not make that field of study is true field of science. In that case, the argument falls apart. Since the negation of (D) destroys the argument, (D) itself is assumed by the argument.

The correct answer is (D).